| Message |
Have *you* worked on these things & seen what I'm talking about?? It's great that you're taking some class on car design, but you're falling into the pointy headed designer mold.. whereas I'm in the real world, bloody knuckles, trying to work on this techno wonder, a new car every week. I've been all over this car, there's *very* few places I haven't been into & taken apart yet. From what I've seen, the only explaination is the NA was designed first... the original plans. It is *very* elegant in design.. as Japanese cars are designed to be. The TT design is technically kludgy... Even *I* w/o the benefit of some car design class can tell something is jacked up with the TT design when compared to the NA. If the TT were sleek, then the NA design would be equally sleek, because it's easier to make a wire shorter then make it longer. As far as the Skyline, if Nissan wanted the Skyline here, it would be here. Follow the money trail. Again, US sales are far higher then Japanese. If they thought they could sell it, then it would be left hand drive in a heartbeat to take advantage of the market. All they have to do is mirror image the part designs & go into production. We also went to the moon w/ as much computing power as the remote control you use to change channels. I don't buy the lack of technology explaination.
Later
   VIVA LA TIVO! |
 |
